I Can Read That

Thoughts on Teaching Reading and Writing

Why (orthographic) rules rule

with 4 comments

While my son Kevin was attending Grade 1, his teacher called me in for a special meeting.  I was puzzled. What did she need to tell me? What had gone wrong?

When we met, she explained that Kevin had been looking over her shoulder recently as she read a book aimed at adults. “I can read that,” he announced. The teacher didn’t believe it.  After he read what she had been reading, she still could not believe it!

I think that he was able to read her book because before he enrolled in school his grandmother had diligently taught him some of the basic orthographic principles, the connections, in other words, between how words are said and how they are written.

Easier if he knows the code

So, by Grade 1, Kevin had three strategies at his disposal.  He could

  • identify unfamiliar written words, using the orthographic principles that he knew at that time. (Strategy 1)
  • recognize, immediately,  frequently occurring words, without sounding them out. (Strategy 2)
  • by using the context of selections as a guide, he could often guess the identity of unfamiliar words that he could not yet fully change to spoken language,  (Strategy 3)

So, for the most part, he was able to translate what his teacher was reading into spoken language.

When students first come to me for instruction, things look quite a bit different.

  • They use Strategy 2. They read by recalling words that they had previously memorized as wholes, without orthographic analysis and synthesis. I asked Parker,  one of my Grade 4 students, how he memorized the words he was instructed to remember. He told me that he wrote each word again and again, trying to  memorize the names of the letters in each word. As a result,  even though he uses English speech sounds every day while talking and listening, he did not  know how to match these speech sounds with the letters and/or groups of letters of our alphabet. (He knows how to do it now!)
  • They cannot use Strategy 1, because they don’t know how to identify unfamiliar written words independently.
  • They cannot  use Strategy 3, unless the selection they are reading contains enough memorized words to enable them to use context as a guide.

Asked to read, they sometimes succeed. How do they feel when they try to identify a word they had not previously memorized? They feel Stumped!

I know a bright little girl who’s in Grade 3. One day, while reading a story, she tried to translate an easily decodable word into spoken language. She thought… and thought… and thought…

Finally, in exasperation, she exclaimed, “I have never seen this word in my whole life!”

If only she had been able to use Strategy 1!

Written by Olga

March 26th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

Posted in Philosophy

4 Responses to 'Why (orthographic) rules rule'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Why (orthographic) rules rule'.

  1. Olga, you refer to “orthographic principles.” Have you ever come across something called Webster’s Syllabary, and if you have, could you comment on its effectiveness for teaching reading and spelling? THat is, syllabaray v. phonics?

    Lily

    4 May 11 at 9:28 am

  2. Lily, thank you for drawing my attention to Webster’s Syllabary, which I had not encountered before. In my opinion, the Syllabary and different means of its implementation are based on solid ground, by concentrating on the connection between an alphabetic code of written language and its spoken counterpart, rather than on the ever newer versions of “sight” word teaching. I take a somewhat different approach to syllabication, both with beginning and more experienced readers. You may be interested in seeing my next Post that deals with syllabication.

    Olga

    11 May 11 at 12:17 am

  3. Are orthographic principles used in public education anymore or is whole language the only accepted literacy philosophy?

    Steve

    18 May 11 at 10:45 pm

  4. Hi Steve! Whole Language, the dominant language arts program meant to teach basic reading and writing for some dozen years or so (around the mid twentieth century) has been discredited and largely abandoned.

    Regrettably, its successors such as Balanced Literacy, like Whole Language, also follow largely the “Look-Say” method of teaching basic reading and writing, initially introduced in the early nineteen sixties. Such programs focus primarily on teaching students to memorize whole words in order to read and/or write. Explanation of English orthography and grammar appears to be, by and large, viewed as an abomination.

    Olga

    20 May 11 at 10:08 pm

Leave a Reply